Windows Server | Eval Center.[SOLVED] Datacenter setup and licensing - Windows Server
Looking for:
Windows server datacenter licensing 2016 free |
Windows server datacenter licensing 2016 free
Windows server datacenter licensing 2016 free.Plan your Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 and SQL Server 2012 end-of-support
Get an award-winning backup solution for Free! Download Now! The price difference becomes apparent for larger customers with a server deployed that exceeds 8-cores per CPU and cores per server. These customers will end up paying additional money for their licenses. Installing a Windows server Standard server means that the initial license will cover up to 16 out of the 48 cores and the customer will need to purchase additional licenses to cover the 32 extra cores!
The following table explains where additional licenses are required depending on the number of CPUs processors and cores per CPU. Figure 1. Microsoft offers its Windows Server in 6 different editions.
Windows Server Datacenter : This edition targets highly virtualized datacenter and cloud environments. Windows Server Standard : Used for physical servers or environments with minimal virtualized requirements. It serves as a critical security component in protecting the transport key, and works in conjunction with other Windows Server components to ensure high security levels for Shielded VMs.
Managed Services. Meet The Team. Our Culture. Free Licensing for Windows Server Datacenter. Previous Next. View Larger Image. If you have any questions about this promotion or the switch from VMware to Hyper-V, you can email us or give us a call at !
Related Posts. August 4th, June 22nd, Windows Server site. About Windows Server. Windows Server is the operating system that bridges on-premises environments with Azure services, enabling hybrid scenarios that maximize existing investments. Increase security and reduce business risk with multiple layers of protection built into the operating system.
Evolve your datacenter infrastructure to achieve greater efficiency and scale with Hyper-converged Infrastructure. Enable developers and IT pros to create cloud native applications and modernize their traditional apps using containers and micro-services. Choose from three primary editions of Windows Server, based on the size of your organization as well as virtualization and datacenter requirements:. Datacenter edition is ideal for highly virtualized and software-defined datacenter environments.
Standard edition is ideal for customers with low density or non-virtualized environments. Essentials edition is a cloud-connected first server, ideal for small businesses with up to 25 users and 50 devices. Essentials is a good option for customers currently using the Foundation edition, which has been discontinued. Essentials edition is licensed under the Specialty Servers license model and does not require Windows Server CALs to access the server. Pricing To give you a more consistent licensing experience across multi-cloud environments, we transitioned from processor-based licensing to core-based licensing for Windows Server Datacenter and Standard editions.
Compare Features View the new hybrid, security, infrastructure, and application platform features of Windows Server as compared to previous versions. Licensing Guide Use this guide to improve your understanding of how to license Microsoft Windows Server.
Shaun wrote: So what I am looking for after all the useful information provided so far is, does it at all sound like my tech has a real handle on this project answer so far leans towards no. A consultant would be another option. Once you know about the storage, let us know. Scott Alan Miller. Shaun wrote: First question or post to spiceworks ever so please bare with me.
Spice 1 flag Report. Shaun wrote: I have just checked in with my tech and found that he has setup 2 servers thus far with data center as DC for the cluster I have never setup a cluster so not sure this is needed so that the first question.
Spice 2 flag Report. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional. Shaun wrote: In addition he has setup 4 hyper-v core nodes and migrated our vms over to them. Shaun wrote: he has setup 4 hyper-v core nodes Watch your terminology as it brings confusion - Hyper-V Server is the free hypervisor-only product. Shaun wrote: The task is to setup a cluster of 6 servers with datacenter as the virtual hosts in a cluster so that any future vms wouldn't require licensing this idea was sold to me at the beginning of the project and we purchased enough core licensing to cover said servers 96 total.
License wise, again, assuming you only have 16 core machines, you look covered. Just curious, you're talking about a cluster - in what way is this a cluster?
Do you have shared storage? OP Shaun The original plan was to get licensing for are physical servers so we wouldn't have to mess with licensing ever again for are VM's addition I have never setup a cluster and my experience with hyper-v has always been within server OS, there is iscsi storage that the VM's share, though I have been here a year and have no solid answer as to how much is available. Hyper-V is free. It is a hypervisor. It doesn't have versions. Shaun wrote: Sorry for the confusion the original idea pitched to me was to have a bed of physical servers clustered together using server datacenter licenses, that would host unlimited VM's on top of them license free.
The original plan was to get licensing for are physical servers so we wouldn't have to mess with licensing ever again for are VM's huh - he installed to Domain Controllers on bare metal? I'd say bring in a consultant. Shaun wrote: Sorry for the confusion the original idea pitched to me was to have a bed of physical servers clustered together using server datacenter licenses , that would host unlimited VM's on top of them license free.
The original plan was to get licensing for are physical servers so we wouldn't have to mess with licensing ever again for are VM's Lots here to cover : First, datacenter licensing isn't related to clustering. We should step back, why do you have so many hosts? Six is enormous. The third method, which may be the most optimal, is to setup AD activation. It appears that you have: host 1 - domain controller - needs 1 Windows standard license host 2 - domain controller - needs 1 Windows standard license host 3 - Hyper-V server - needs DataCenter license for the number of cores in host host 4 - Hyper-V server - needs DataCenter license for the number of cores in host host 5 - Hyper-V server - needs DataCenter license for the number of cores in host host 6 - Hyper-V server - needs DataCenter license for the number of cores in host Again that is only for what you have listed.
Obsolesce This person is a verified professional. How many virtual machines do you have, and what are the resource requirements of the top 5? Are you SURE you need 6??? One host equals huge single point of failure. That single host is much more likely to stay running than 2 or more servers. Also, there are other things in place such as backups, replication, etc.
Please compare the risk factor of the alternative for us. Dashrender wrote: I know Scott said this already, but clustering is not a license function of Windows Server DataCenter edition. Shaun wrote: Dashrender wrote: I know Scott said this already, but clustering is not a license function of Windows Server DataCenter edition. So it makes it really hard for us to know what's going on. It's hard to know by how you are describing things.
There is definitely a lack of understanding on both sides, as well as lack of communication. We definitely need a ton of clarification. Wow - that seems insane.. Shaun wrote: This is a correct layout of what we currently have, host 1 and 2 he has setup as DC for the cluster because he states they need to be in there own domain. What is holding the storage used by this 'cluster'? Shaun wrote: We are a small agency and im pretty sure the over all server footprint we have is extremely bloated compared to what we actually need so I am hesitant to let him proceed now setting up a modern version of the older configuration.
You're considering upgrading these systems? Shaun wrote: To clerify terminology "hyper-v core" was what I was told, when I hear core I think of the server core vs GUI install option. Things to remember Hyper-V is always free. It just is. Windows Server always has licensing. Shaun wrote: So those 4 hosts are hyper-v server, where as my thinking is we would need to be using server datacenter core instead, I understand it has a bigger footprint, but that is what my reading has pointed me to so far, which is what raised the questions about what he is actually doing and if it is being done correctly.
Yes, installing Windows Server Core will have a larger footprint. We are still looking for where your storage for these nodes is. Though Tim has provided at least one plausible reason as to why he has setup the domain controllers So what I am looking for after all the useful information provided so far is, does it at all sound like my tech has a real handle on this project answer so far leans towards no. If not, we're about to save you a bundle of money. Now that said, a license can't be split over two servers.
So if you have VMs as follows 3 5 requires 3 licenses 4 5 requires 3 licenses 5 6 requires 3 licenses 6 7 requires 4 licenses. In this setup, you'd need 13 licenses to cover this setup. Shaun wrote: You are correct he is telling me what he is doing, but though technical terms are being used, they make no since and raise enough flags for me to reach out here. Though Tim has provided at least one plausible reason as to why he has setup the domain controllers I don't see where Tim gives a plausible reason for AD DCs I do see where he says those machines are possibly a cluster of storage iSCSI.
Dashrender wrote: Shaun wrote: You are correct he is telling me what he is doing, but though technical terms are being used, they make no since and raise enough flags for me to reach out here. I still don't know what he means by cluster. Shaun wrote: We have established that when he told me hyper-v core he most likely meant hyper-v server so we can move past that.
Dashrender wrote: Shaun wrote: To clerify terminology "hyper-v core" was what I was told, when I hear core I think of the server core vs GUI install option. M Boyle This person is a verified professional.
Time for a consultant orr local MSP to com in and do an audit of the entire setup.
Comments
Post a Comment